According to Business Insider, Barry Duong, previously a portfolio manager at Balyasny Asset Management and analyst at Citadel, now serves as lead AI strategist for public equities at AI startup Hebbia. After leaving Balyasny under a noncompete agreement, Duong began exploring AI tools and discovered capabilities far beyond his expectations, leading him to join Hebbia earlier this year. His team has processed over one billion pages of information for clients, equivalent to approximately 3,000 years of reading and 2,000 years of analysis. Duong’s work involves developing prompt libraries, conducting training sessions for hundreds of financial services employees, and creating customized workflows that range from automating PowerPoint decks to financial modeling. This career transition highlights how AI is reshaping financial services roles and workflows.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Technical Architecture Behind Financial AI
The transition from traditional financial analysis to AI-powered workflows represents a fundamental shift in how financial institutions process information. Unlike consumer-facing AI tools, financial AI systems like those Duong describes require robust retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) architectures that can handle hundreds of thousands of pages of financial documents, SEC filings, earnings transcripts, and market data. The technical challenge isn’t just about processing volume but ensuring accuracy in financial calculations and maintaining consistency across complex numerical analyses. These systems typically combine multiple specialized models rather than relying on a single LLM, with different components optimized for numerical reasoning, document analysis, and financial modeling tasks.
Why Domain Expertise Trumps Pure Technical Skills
Duong’s emphasis on hiring from “tier-one financial services firms” rather than traditional Silicon Valley technical talent reveals a crucial insight about AI implementation in regulated industries. Financial AI requires deep understanding of compliance requirements, regulatory frameworks, and the nuanced decision-making processes that govern investment decisions. The most effective AI strategists in finance aren’t necessarily the best prompt engineers but those who understand both the technical capabilities and the business context. This explains why firms are prioritizing professionals who can bridge the gap between quantitative analysis and practical investment decision-making, creating a new hybrid role that combines financial acumen with AI literacy.
The Coming Revolution in Financial Workflows
The automation of PowerPoint decks and financial models represents just the surface level of AI’s impact on financial services. More fundamentally, we’re seeing the emergence of what I call “augmented analysis” – where AI handles the data gathering and preliminary analysis while humans focus on strategic interpretation and relationship management. This shift will transform junior roles from data processors to AI orchestrators, requiring new skills in prompt engineering, model selection, and workflow design. The most successful financial institutions will be those that redesign their entire operational structure around these new capabilities, rather than simply bolting AI tools onto existing processes.
Where Humans Still Dominate in AI-Driven Finance
Despite processing billions of pages of data, Duong emphasizes that “the human in the loop is very important” – particularly for creativity, problem-solving, and what he calls “hand-to-hand combat.” This reflects a broader truth about AI in finance: while machines excel at pattern recognition and data processing, human judgment remains essential for contextual understanding, relationship management, and strategic decision-making. The most valuable financial professionals will be those who can leverage AI to enhance their unique human capabilities rather than competing with the technology on its own terms. This suggests that soft skills like communication, creativity, and strategic thinking may become even more valuable as technical tasks become automated.
The Future of Financial Careers in an AI World
Duong’s prediction that “junior people will now become managers of agents” points to a fundamental restructuring of career paths in finance. Traditional apprenticeship models where junior analysts learn by doing repetitive analytical work may be replaced by systems where they learn by managing AI systems that perform that work. This requires a complete rethinking of training programs, performance metrics, and career progression. Financial institutions will need to develop new frameworks for evaluating performance when much of the traditional “grunt work” has been automated, focusing instead on strategic contribution, AI management capabilities, and creative problem-solving. The most forward-thinking firms are already redesigning their talent development programs to prepare for this new reality.
