**
Major news organizations including The New York Times, Associated Press, and conservative outlet Newsmax are refusing to sign the Pentagon’s new press rules, risking credential revocation in a standoff over First Amendment protections. The Trump administration’s deadline requires written acknowledgment of controversial media procedures that outlets say criminalize routine newsgathering.
Media Outlets United in First Amendment Challenge
Reuters, The Washington Post, and The Atlantic joined the growing boycott Monday, with Reuters stating: “We steadfastly believe in the press protections afforded by the U.S. Constitution… The Pentagon’s new restrictions erode these fundamental values.” The policy requires reporters to acknowledge that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth can revoke access for seeking any information—classified or otherwise—without prior approval. This development comes amid increasing scrutiny of corporate power across other sectors.
Pentagon Leadership Defends “Common Sense” Policy
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth responded to The New York Times’ statement on X with a hand-waving emoji, while his team enforced Tuesday’s signing deadline. Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell called the rules “common sense media procedures,” adding: “This has caused reporters to have a full blown meltdown, crying victim online.” The policy affects access to the Pentagon complex, where reporters must now be escorted through large areas.
Journalists: Rules Equate Reporting with Security Threats
Pentagon correspondents argue that signing the document implies admitting that reporting unapproved information harms national security. “That’s simply not true,” said David Schulz of Yale’s Media Freedom & Information Access Clinic. Journalists emphasize they already wear badges, avoid classified areas, and don’t endanger Americans—contrary to Department of Defense implications. The conflict emerges as geopolitical tensions affect multiple industries.
Conservative Outlet Newsmax Joins Unusual Alliance
In a rare show of media unity, Newsmax—typically supportive of the Trump administration—called the requirements “unnecessary and onerous.” The network joined liberal-leaning publications in arguing the policy imposes prior restraint on protected news activities. This cross-ideological opposition occurs alongside major corporate developments in technology and finance according to industry experts.
Constitutional Clash Over Press Freedom
The standoff represents a fundamental conflict between government security claims and press freedoms. Hegseth reposted a question asking if reporters believe they “deserve unrestricted access to a highly classified military installation under the First Amendment,” answering “yes”—though journalists counter they’ve never sought such access. Additional coverage of corporate environmental initiatives shows how other sectors balance transparency with operational needs.
- Deadline: Tuesday for written acknowledgment
- Consequence: Badge surrender and workspace clearance
- Key restriction: Escort requirement for Pentagon access
- Legal concern: Prior restraint on information gathering
With neither side showing signs of compromise, the confrontation threatens to remove established Pentagon reporters as early as Wednesday, potentially creating significant gaps in national security coverage during a period of global uncertainty.
