Reddit Escalates Legal Battle Against AI Firms Over Alleged Data Theft

The Copyright Showdown Intensifies

Social media giant Reddit has launched a significant legal offensive against artificial intelligence company Perplexity and three data-scraping entities, alleging systematic copyright infringement through unauthorized data collection practices. The lawsuit, filed in New York federal court, represents the latest escalation in the ongoing conflict between content platforms and AI developers over training data sourcing.

Multiple Defendants in Crosshairs

Reddit’s complaint targets not only Perplexity but also three specialized data service providers: Lithuanian company Oxylabs UAB, former Russian botnet operator AWMProxy, and Texas-based startup SerpApi. According to court documents, Reddit accuses these entities of employing sophisticated techniques to bypass security measures, including masking identities, concealing locations, and disguising web scrapers as human users.

Ben Lee, Reddit’s Chief Legal Officer, characterized the situation as an “arms race for quality human content” that has spawned what he termed an “industrial-scale data laundering economy”. The allegations suggest that Perplexity knowingly engaged with at least one of these scraping services to obtain Reddit’s copyrighted material for training its AI-powered search engine.

The Data Scraping Ecosystem

Reddit’s legal filing paints a picture of a coordinated data acquisition network where specialized scraping services facilitate access to protected content. The platform alleges that Perplexity “desperately needed” Reddit’s data to power its “answer engine” and utilized these services to scrape information through Google search results.

SerpApi has publicly contested the allegations, stating: “We strongly disagree with Reddit’s allegations and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in court.” Meanwhile, Perplexity and Oxylabs have remained silent, not responding to requests for comment, and AWMProxy could not be reached., according to technology trends

Broader Industry Implications

This lawsuit joins dozens of similar copyright cases filed against AI companies since the emergence of generative AI systems. The core conflict revolves around whether AI developers can legally use publicly available internet content to train their models without explicit permission or compensation to copyright holders.

Reddit’s position is particularly noteworthy given its recent commercial agreements with major tech companies. The platform, which went public in March 2024, has established multimillion-dollar partnerships with both Google and OpenAI, granting them authorized access to its content for AI training purposes.

Strategic Legal Positioning

According to sources familiar with the matter, Reddit had previously attempted to resolve the dispute through negotiation. The company reportedly approached Perplexity about establishing a paid partnership similar to its arrangements with other AI firms, but Perplexity founder Aravind Srinivas allegedly showed no interest.

Reddit also escalated its concerns to Google, requesting the search giant investigate whether Perplexity was using Google’s platform to access Reddit’s proprietary data and develop preventive measures. Google has declined to comment on the matter.

Pattern of Enforcement

This lawsuit follows Reddit’s similar legal action against AI startup Anthropic in June, alleging that company scraped Reddit’s platform more than 100,000 times since July 2024. Anthropic, like the current defendants, pledged to vigorously contest the allegations., as as previously reported

Lee emphasized Reddit’s particular vulnerability to such practices, noting the platform represents “one of the largest and most dynamic collections of human conversation ever created,” making it an attractive target for AI companies seeking training data.

The Future of AI Data Sourcing

This case highlights the evolving landscape of data rights in the AI era. As platforms increasingly monetize their user-generated content through licensing agreements, unauthorized data scraping faces growing legal challenges. The outcome of this and similar cases could establish important precedents for how AI companies legally source training data moving forward.

The resolution of these conflicts will likely shape the development of AI technologies and determine the economic relationship between content platforms and the AI industry for years to come.

This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.

Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.