Starship Progress Amid Lunar Mission Challenges
SpaceX is reportedly celebrating two consecutive Starship launches without unplanned explosions, yet sources indicate the business faces a daunting path forward before the spacecraft can deliver astronauts to the lunar surface. According to reports, former NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine didn’t mince words when he questioned the use of Starship to return boots to the Moon, stating “This is an architecture that no NASA administrator that I’m aware of would have selected had they had the choice.”
Complex Architecture Compared to Apollo Simplicity
The contrast with Apollo appears stark, analysts suggest. The Saturn V reportedly accomplished Moon missions with a single launch, carrying everything needed for the journey. Today’s approach requires one Space Launch System rocket plus an undetermined number of Starship launches – some estimates suggest ten or more refueling flights, though the report states the actual figure could be considerably higher.
NASA’s ambitions reportedly extend well beyond Apollo’s goals, with the agency planning a technically challenging south pole landing to access suspected water ice deposits. Apollo, by contrast, aimed primarily to beat the Soviet Union to the Moon – a simpler objective that demanded less sophisticated hardware. However, sources indicate nostalgia won’t solve today’s problems, as the Saturn V and its supporting infrastructure are long retired, and budget constraints – far tighter than during Apollo’s heyday – further limit options.
Orbital Refueling and Technical Hurdles
These realities reportedly explain SpaceX‘s 2021 selection for the Human Landing System contract. The company’s proposal envisions launching an HLS variant of Starship uncrewed, refueling it in orbit through multiple tanker flights, then sending it to lunar orbit. Astronauts launched aboard SLS in an Orion capsule would rendezvous with the waiting Starship, transfer aboard, and descend to the surface.
Despite two successful suborbital lobs of a Starship prototype, the report states SpaceX has yet to reach orbit, let alone transfer fuel. Sources indicate there is very little detail on how the HLS variant of Starship will land on the lunar surface, and the rate at which the fuel will boil off in space remains unknown – a critical factor if delays occur in other parts of the mission.
Development Approach and Timeline Concerns
One observer that asked to remain anonymous told The Register that SpaceX’s approach is to deal with each problem as it arises, explaining why there is still very little information on key technical challenges. The report states that critical capabilities remain undemonstrated to meet NASA’s requirements, including landing a tall vehicle on potentially rough terrain.
The clock is reportedly ticking, with NASA having committed to the current approach and officials hoping SpaceX accelerates Starship testing in 2026. Failure to do so means that returning to the Moon before 2030 appears a distant challenge, according to analysts. As for the original 2027 target, sources suggest it now looks completely implausible given the technical and operational hurdles that remain unresolved.
SpaceX’s track record includes many impressive feats, including successfully landing its rockets and catching a returning Super Heavy Booster. However, the complex architecture required for lunar missions – requiring multiple launches and orbital refueling – presents unprecedented challenges that will require extensive demonstration and validation before astronauts can safely travel to the Moon and back aboard the vehicle.
This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.
