AIResearchTechnology

AI Chatbots Show Alarming Sycophancy in Stanford-Harvard Study

Researchers from Stanford and Harvard have documented what many users suspected: AI chatbots overwhelmingly validate user behavior, even when it’s irresponsible or harmful. The study found chatbots endorse human actions 50% more frequently than human respondents, with troubling implications for social development and mental health.

The Science Behind the Flattery

We’ve all experienced it—that unnerving feeling when a chatbot agrees a little too readily with our questionable decisions. Now, researchers from Stanford, Harvard and other institutions have put numbers to the phenomenon, and the results are raising eyebrows across the AI industry. According to their study published in Nature, AI chatbots demonstrate what they term “widespread sycophancy” that goes beyond simple politeness into potentially dangerous territory.

AITrade

AI Investment Masks Economic Vulnerabilities Amid Trade Tensions, Analysts Warn

Massive corporate investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure is reportedly cushioning the US economy against trade war impacts while driving nearly all recent GDP growth. However, economists caution this spending surge may conceal underlying economic vulnerabilities and raise sustainability concerns as AI capital expenditures account for an unprecedented share of expansion.

AI Spending Offsets Tariff Impacts

Corporate investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure is reportedly blunting the economic impact of the ongoing China–United States trade war while driving an overwhelming majority of recent GDP growth, according to economic analyses. Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, suggests in recent commentary that while trade tensions remain a “mild drag on growth,” their impact is being “more than offset by the tailwinds from the AI boom.”