According to Forbes, Threads has surpassed X in monthly active users for the first time since its July 2023 launch, marking a significant milestone in the ongoing battle between Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. The data from Similarweb shows Threads’ daily worldwide mobile users increased 48% year-over-year as of October, while X’s dropped 16%. Despite X maintaining a substantial lead in web traffic with 141.7 million daily web users compared to Threads’ 7.6 million, the mobile gap has narrowed significantly in the U.S., where Threads now has 16.6 million daily active users versus X’s 21.4 million. The platform benefits from heavy cross-promotion on Instagram, which boasts 968.6 million daily active users on mobile devices worldwide. This development signals a meaningful shift in the social media landscape that warrants deeper analysis.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
Meta’s Built-in Advantages
Threads’ rapid growth trajectory highlights Meta’s structural advantages in platform development that most competitors simply cannot match. The seamless integration with Instagram provides an immediate user base and reduces friction in adoption—new users can sign up in seconds using existing credentials. This cross-platform strategy represents a fundamental shift in how social networks can leverage established ecosystems to challenge incumbents. While X struggles with rebuilding user trust and refining its monetization strategy, Threads benefits from Meta’s mature advertising infrastructure and proven content moderation systems. The ability to quickly scale while maintaining platform stability gives Meta a significant operational advantage that extends beyond mere user numbers.
Broader Market Implications
The narrowing gap between Threads and X reflects deeper changes in social media consumption patterns and platform loyalty. Users are increasingly platform-agnostic and willing to migrate when alternatives offer comparable functionality with fewer controversies. This trend threatens X’s position as the default public square for real-time conversation, particularly among younger demographics who value stability and consistent user experience. The competition also puts pressure on both platforms to innovate faster in areas like creator monetization, algorithmic transparency, and community features. As Zuckerberg’s meme post at Threads’ launch indicated, Meta understands the importance of cultural relevance in platform adoption beyond technical features.
Sustainability Challenges Ahead
While Threads’ growth numbers are impressive, the platform faces significant challenges in establishing its own identity and retaining users long-term. The network effect that made Twitter dominant for years doesn’t automatically transfer to new platforms, even with Meta’s resources. Threads must develop unique value propositions beyond being “the alternative to X” to maintain momentum. The platform’s description as “Instagram’s text-based conversation app” suggests an ongoing identity crisis—is it an extension of Instagram or a standalone competitor to X? This ambiguity could hinder its ability to attract power users who drive engagement and content creation. Additionally, as initial download surges normalize, Threads must prove it can sustain organic growth without constant cross-promotion.
Ripple Effects Across Social Media
The Threads-X competition is creating ripple effects throughout the social media ecosystem that extend beyond these two platforms. Smaller microblogging alternatives like Bluesky and Mastodon face increased pressure as mainstream users gravitate toward the two best-funded options. The battle also influences how platforms approach content moderation and community guidelines, with Threads positioning itself as a more controlled environment compared to X’s free speech emphasis. This dynamic could lead to further platform fragmentation based on content preferences and tolerance for controversial speech. The ongoing personal rivalry between Zuckerberg and Musk, including their public disagreements over AI regulation, adds a layer of personal stakes that could accelerate feature development and platform evolution beyond typical competitive pressures.
The Financial Stakes
From an investment perspective, the social media platform battle represents a critical test of whether massive resources can overcome first-mover advantage and network effects. Meta’s ability to leverage its existing infrastructure gives it a cost advantage in user acquisition and platform development that X cannot match. However, X’s stronger web presence and established creator ecosystems provide defensive moats that will be difficult to breach completely. The competition also highlights the increasing importance of mobile-first strategies in social media, where Threads’ design advantages become more pronounced. As both platforms continue to evolve their monetization approaches, the ultimate winner may be determined by which can better balance user experience with sustainable revenue models in an increasingly fragmented attention economy.
