In a remarkably candid moment at California’s Paley International Council Summit, Xbox chief Phil Spencer acknowledged what many in the gaming industry have observed for years: Microsoft’s gaming division hasn’t consistently protected the creative talent behind its biggest franchises.
Table of Contents
A Candid Admission
Speaking alongside Double Fine head Tim Schafer, Spencer didn’t mince words about the challenges creative teams face in today’s hyper-critical online environment. “The creativity of the teams is, in my mind, the most important thing and the thing that we need to protect and foster,” Spencer stated, according to reports from the moderated discussion.
He went even further, admitting that Xbox “doesn’t always succeed” at shielding developers from the often-brutal discourse that follows game releases. Spencer called the act of putting creative work online for public judgment “the most brave thing a team can do,” adding that he sometimes wonders why anyone would subject themselves to that environment.
The Layoff Contradiction
This acknowledgment of creative vulnerability stands in stark contrast to Xbox’s recent corporate actions. Industry analysts have been tracking what appears to be a significant contradiction between Spencer’s protective rhetoric and the company’s aggressive cost-cutting measures.
According to employment reports and industry analysis, Xbox eliminated approximately 1,900 positions following its Activision Blizzard acquisition in early 2024. The cuts accelerated dramatically through 2025, with roughly 7,000 jobs reportedly eliminated in May and another 9,000 in July—bringing the annual total to nearly 18,000 positions lost.
Meanwhile, the company reached a staggering $4 trillion valuation at the end of July, suggesting that financial performance and creative protection might be operating on different tracks within the organization.
The Double Fine Exception
The summit conversation took an interesting turn when Schafer described his studio’s very different experience under the Xbox umbrella. Double Fine, acquired by Microsoft in 2019, appears to have maintained what Schafer calls its “creative independence” despite the broader corporate restructuring.
“When we talked about becoming acquired, it was a big thing for me, like, ‘How do we keep our culture intact?'” Schafer recalled. “And everyone was like, ‘No, we really want you to stay who you are.'”
That commitment apparently extended to unconventional projects. Schafer noted that when his team proposed “a game about a walking lighthouse,” Xbox leadership simply responded, “Cool. Sounds cool.” The resulting title, Keeper, has earned critical acclaim, including a 9/10 score from gaming publication reviews that praised it as “a visual feast” and “a fable about the world and what we owe to it.”
Broader Industry Implications
Spencer’s comments reflect a growing tension across the media landscape. As industry leaders grapple with shareholder expectations and market pressures, the fundamental creative processes that drive entertainment face increasing threats.
An October 2025 Bloomberg analysis suggested that Xbox’s “mountainous profit goals” might be causing more harm than good—a concern that resonates across gaming and media companies struggling to balance financial performance with sustainable creative development.
What remains unclear is whether Spencer’s public acknowledgment signals a genuine shift in corporate priorities or simply reflects the difficult reality of managing creative enterprises in today’s market. For the thousands of developers affected by recent layoffs, the proof will be in Microsoft’s future actions rather than its executive admissions.