According to TheRegister.com, US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s talks in South Korea resulted in modest trade concessions including a 10 percentage point reduction in US tariffs on Chinese imports to approximately 47 percent, down from previous threats of tariffs as high as 145 percent. China agreed to pause its recent rare-earth export restrictions for one year to “study and refine specific plans,” while discussions about Nvidia chip exports occurred but specifically excluded the advanced Blackwell GPUs that Trump had previously considered allowing with reduced capacity. Despite Trump’s admission that “we did discuss chips” and that “they’re going to be talking to Nvidia,” no breakthroughs were achieved on the critical AI semiconductor export restrictions that have trapped Nvidia between US export controls and Chinese regulatory pressure. This temporary reprieve highlights the ongoing complexity of US-China tech relations.
Table of Contents
The Rare Earth Gambit
China’s decision to pause rare-earth restrictions represents a calculated strategic move rather than genuine concession. Rare earth elements are critical components in everything from electric vehicles and wind turbines to advanced military systems, and China controls approximately 80% of global processing capacity. The temporary pause gives Chinese authorities time to refine their export control mechanisms while maintaining leverage over Western technology companies. What TheRegister.com’s report doesn’t fully capture is how this one-year window aligns perfectly with China’s broader strategy to dominate the entire rare-earth supply chain, from mining to manufacturing. Companies dependent on these materials now face exactly one year to either diversify their supply chains or prepare for potentially more sophisticated restrictions in 2026.
Nvidia’s Impossible Position
The continued blockade on Nvidia‘s Blackwell GPUs reveals the fundamental incompatibility of US and Chinese technological ambitions. While the talks acknowledged Nvidia’s central role in the AI ecosystem, the specific exclusion of Blackwell chips demonstrates that both superpowers view advanced AI compute as a national security priority. Nvidia finds itself in an increasingly impossible position: caught between US administration export controls designed to maintain American technological supremacy and Chinese pressure to either circumvent these restrictions or face market exclusion. The company’s attempts to create export-compliant versions of its chips have largely failed to satisfy either government, creating a no-win scenario that threatens to permanently bifurcate the global AI market.
The Temporary Tariff Calculus
The 10-point tariff reduction represents more political theater than substantive economic policy. Reducing tariffs from approximately 57% to 47% still leaves them at historically high levels, and the connection to fentanyl exports suggests these negotiations involved unrelated issues being used as bargaining chips. More importantly, tariffs at this level continue to make many technology products economically unviable for cross-border trade, forcing companies to either absorb massive costs or restructure their supply chains entirely. The temporary nature of these concessions—coupled with the White House’s reduced capacity to provide details—indicates that neither side expects this to be a lasting solution. Technology companies should view this as a brief operational window rather than a fundamental shift in trade policy.
Strategic Implications Beyond the Headlines
What makes this temporary truce particularly concerning for the tech industry is what wasn’t discussed: the underlying structural issues driving the US-China tech competition. Neither side appears willing to address the fundamental incompatibility between American export control regimes and Chinese technological self-sufficiency goals. The absence of meaningful discussion about intellectual property protection, forced technology transfer, or market access suggests that both governments are preparing for prolonged technological decoupling. For global technology companies, this means the era of integrated global supply chains is effectively over, replaced by a new reality where operating in both markets requires maintaining parallel, separate operations with duplicate R&D, manufacturing, and distribution networks.
The New Normal for Tech
The most significant takeaway from these talks isn’t what was achieved but what remains unresolved. The technology industry now faces a future where geopolitical considerations routinely override commercial logic, where national security concerns dictate market access, and where temporary reprieves become the best-case scenario. Companies like Nvidia that operate at the intersection of national security and commercial technology will need to develop entirely new business models that account for permanent trade barriers and bifurcated technological standards. The era of global technology integration has ended, replaced by a fragile coexistence between competing technological ecosystems that will define the next decade of innovation and competition.
